Attestation-Based Access Control for Non-Human Identities

attestation access control non-human identity workload identity machine identity zero trust
Lalit Choda
Lalit Choda

Founder & CEO @ Non-Human Identity Mgmt Group

 
June 24, 2025 12 min read

Understanding Non-Human Identities and Their Security Challenges

Did you know that non-human identities (NHIs) are quietly revolutionizing how systems communicate and operate? (The silent threat: Why non-human identities are the new enterprise ...) However, this rise in machine-to-machine interactions introduces new security challenges that demand a focused approach. (The risks of autonomous AI in machine-to- ...)

NHIs are digital identities used by applications, services, and devices to interact with each other and access resources. (What Are Non-Human Identities and How to Secure Them | Okta) They come in many forms, including:

  • Service Accounts: Used by applications to access databases or other services. For instance, a retail application might use a service account to access inventory data.
  • Workload Identities: Used in cloud environments like aws, azure, or google cloud to grant permissions to applications running within containers or VMs.
  • Device Identities: Represent IoT devices, such as medical devices in healthcare or point-of-sale systems in retail, each requiring secure access to networks and data. According to Apple, device attestation provides strong evidence about which properties of a device can be used as part of a trust evaluation. This is especially important in industries that rely heavily on IoT devices.
  • Robotic Process Automation (RPA) Bots: These bots automate tasks across different systems, requiring access to various applications and data sources.

Securing NHIs presents unique challenges:

  • Identity Sprawl: The sheer number of NHIs can be overwhelming.
  • Lack of Visibility: Unlike human users, NHIs often operate behind the scenes, making them harder to monitor.
  • Over-Privileged Access: NHIs are often granted broad permissions, exceeding what they actually need.
  • Complexity of Attestation: While attestation itself is a solution, the process of implementing and managing it can be complex. According to a ServiceNow Community post, attestations are surveys that gather evidence to prove that a control is implemented. This ensures that controls are not only in place but also effective.
  • Key Management: Managing and rotating keys and secrets for NHIs can be complex and prone to errors.

Diagram 1

As NHIs become more prevalent, a robust security strategy is essential. This is where attestation-based access control comes into play, offering a powerful solution to verify the trustworthiness of these identities.

In the next section, we'll explore what attestation-based access control is and how it works.

What is Attestation-Based Access Control?

Did you know that unauthorized access by non-human identities (NHIs) is a growing concern for organizations? Attestation-based access control offers a robust solution by verifying the trustworthiness of these identities before granting access.

Attestation-based access control is a security mechanism that validates the integrity and trustworthiness of an NHI before it's allowed to access resources. It works by gathering evidence about the NHI’s identity, configuration, and runtime environment, then comparing this evidence against a set of predefined policies. If the NHI meets the required criteria, it's granted access; otherwise, access is denied. According to One Identity, identity and access attestation is a process that involves verifying and validating the identity of individuals and managing their access to systems, applications or resources within an organization.

  • Evidence Collection: This involves gathering data about the NHI, such as its software version, configuration settings, and security posture. For device attestation, as mentioned earlier, properties of a device can be used as part of a trust evaluation.
  • Policy Definition: Organizations define policies that specify the required attributes and conditions for an NHI to be considered trustworthy. These policies might include factors like compliance with security standards, the absence of malware, or adherence to specific configurations.
  • Attestation Verification: The collected evidence is compared against the defined policies. This process often involves cryptographic techniques to ensure the integrity and authenticity of the evidence.
  • Access Control Enforcement: Based on the attestation results, access control decisions are made. NHIs that pass attestation are granted access, while those that fail are denied or given limited access.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Attestation isn't a one-time event. Continuous monitoring ensures that NHIs remain compliant with security policies throughout their lifecycle.

Consider a cloud-based service account used by a financial institution. Attestation-based access control could verify that the service account is running the correct version of its application, has the necessary security patches installed, and is operating within a secure environment.

Diagram 2

By implementing attestation-based access control, organizations can significantly reduce the risk of unauthorized access and improve their overall security posture. Next, we'll dive into the various attestation methods and technologies available.

Attestation Methods and Technologies

Ever wondered how attestation goes from theory to reality? It's all about the methods and technologies that power this security mechanism.

Several attestation methods exist, each with unique characteristics and use cases. Understanding these differences is key to choosing the right approach for your non-human identities (NHIs).

  • Hardware-Based Attestation: This method relies on hardware security modules (HSMs) or Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) to provide a root of trust. These hardware components generate and store cryptographic keys, ensuring the integrity of the attestation process. For example, Azure Attestation supports attestation of platforms backed by TPMs, providing proof of a platform's state.
  • Software-Based Attestation: This approach uses software to verify the integrity of an NHI. It typically involves measuring the software's code and configuration, then comparing these measurements against a known good baseline. While flexible, it can be more susceptible to tampering than hardware-based methods because the software itself could be compromised or manipulated before the attestation process begins.
  • Remote Attestation: This method involves a trusted third party verifying the integrity of an NHI. The NHI provides evidence about its state to the third party, which then assesses the evidence against predefined policies. A trusted third party in this context is an entity that both the NHI and the resource it's trying to access trust to act as an impartial verifier. The typical process involves the NHI sending cryptographic evidence (like measurements or signed attestations) to the third party, which then validates this evidence against established security policies before issuing a trusted attestation report.
  • Platform Attestation: As mentioned earlier, properties of a device can be used as part of a trust evaluation. Apple devices use platform attestation to ensure that only devices meeting certain hardware requirements are issued attestations. This involves the device's hardware and firmware providing cryptographic proof of its identity and configuration.

Various technologies support attestation-based access control, making it easier to implement and manage.

  • TPMs (Trusted Platform Modules): TPMs are hardware chips that provide secure storage for cryptographic keys and enable hardware-based attestation. They're commonly used in laptops, servers, and IoT devices.
  • HSMs (Hardware Security Modules): HSMs are dedicated hardware devices that provide a secure environment for cryptographic operations. They are often used in financial institutions and other high-security environments.
  • Azure Attestation: This Microsoft service provides a unified solution for remotely verifying the trustworthiness of a platform and the integrity of binaries running inside it. It supports attestation of various environments, including TPMs and SGX enclaves, making it a versatile tool for cloud-native security.
  • ACME (Automated Certificate Management Environment): ACME is a protocol for automating the issuance and management of digital certificates. Apple devices can use ACME payload attestation to enroll a client certificate identity, which can cryptographically validate that the device is a genuine Apple device.

In the automotive industry, hardware-based attestation using TPMs can ensure the integrity of software updates in connected vehicles. This prevents malicious actors from injecting malware through compromised updates.

By understanding the various attestation methods and technologies, organizations can build robust security strategies for their non-human identities. Next, we'll delve into implementing attestation-based access control for NHIs.

Implementing Attestation-Based Access Control for NHIs

Implementing attestation-based access control for non-human identities (NHIs) might seem daunting, but with a strategic approach, it can significantly enhance your security posture. Let's break down the essential steps to get you started.

  1. Identify NHIs: Begin by cataloging all NHIs within your environment. This includes service accounts, workload identities, and device identities. Understanding the scope is crucial for effective implementation.

  2. Define Attestation Policies: Create clear policies that outline the required attributes and conditions for an NHI to be considered trustworthy. These policies should align with your organization's security standards and compliance requirements. For example, policies might specify acceptable software versions or require the absence of known vulnerabilities.

  3. Choose Attestation Methods: Select the appropriate attestation methods based on your NHIs and infrastructure. Hardware-based attestation, as mentioned earlier, offers a strong root of trust, while software-based attestation provides flexibility.

  4. Implement Attestation Technologies: Integrate technologies like TPMs, HSMs, or services such as Azure Attestation to collect and verify evidence about NHIs. Azure Attestation provides a unified solution for verifying platform trustworthiness.

  5. Automate the Process: Automate evidence collection, policy evaluation, and access control enforcement to ensure continuous monitoring and consistent application of attestation policies. Automation minimizes manual effort and reduces the risk of human error.

Implementing attestation-based access control requires careful planning and execution.

  • Start Small: Begin with a pilot project involving a subset of NHIs to test and refine your implementation. This allows you to identify potential issues and optimize your approach before a full-scale rollout.
  • Continuous Monitoring: To effectively implement continuous monitoring for attestation-based access control, you'll want to establish regular checks of NHI states and configurations. This can involve automated scans that periodically re-evaluate the evidence provided by NHIs against your defined policies. If an NHI's state drifts from the policy (e.g., a new vulnerability is discovered in its software), alerts can be triggered, and access can be automatically revoked or restricted until the issue is resolved. As One Identity explains, attestation and identity governance ensure that users can continue performing their jobs through changes in their authorization to access information, data and resources.
  • Integrate with Existing Systems: Integrate attestation-based access control with your existing identity and access management (IAM) systems to streamline operations and avoid creating silos.

Consider a healthcare provider using medical devices (device identities) to collect patient data. By implementing attestation-based access control, the provider can ensure that only authorized and verified devices can access sensitive patient information. The attestation process could verify device integrity, software versions, and security configurations, preventing unauthorized access and data breaches.

By following these steps and tailoring your approach to your specific environment, you can successfully implement attestation-based access control and significantly improve the security of your NHIs.

Next, we'll explore some specific use cases where attestation-based access control can be particularly beneficial.

Use Cases for Attestation-Based Access Control

Ever wondered how attestation-based access control plays out in the real world? The possibilities are vast, and the security enhancements are significant across various sectors.

  • Attestation-based access control is ideal for securing workload identities in cloud environments. For instance, a microservice in a financial application can use attestation to prove it's running in a secure, compliant environment before accessing sensitive customer data.

  • In DevOps pipelines, attestation ensures that only verified and trusted code deployments are executed. This prevents malicious code injections and maintains the integrity of the software supply chain.

  • Azure Attestation plays a critical role in verifying the trustworthiness of platforms and binaries, ensuring that cloud workloads operate within a secure and compliant environment.

  • Attestation is crucial for IoT device security, especially in industries like healthcare. Medical devices can attest to their integrity before transmitting patient data, ensuring that only verified devices are communicating sensitive information. Apple devices use platform attestation to ensure that only devices meeting certain hardware requirements are issued attestations. This means that a medical device, for example, would need to prove it's a genuine Apple device running approved software before it can send patient data.

  • In industrial IoT (IIoT), attestation can verify the integrity of manufacturing equipment, preventing unauthorized access and tampering that could lead to production disruptions or safety hazards.

  • Confidential Containers can use attestation to prove they are running in a trusted execution environment (TEE), isolating them from the control plane and other containers. A TEE is a secure area within a processor that guarantees code and data loaded inside it are protected from the rest of the system. Azure Attestation supports attestation for confidential containers, ensuring that sensitive data remains protected within these isolated environments.

  • Attestation can be integrated into Kubernetes to verify the integrity of container images before deployment. This ensures that only trusted and verified containers are running within the cluster, reducing the risk of supply chain attacks.

  • Apple devices can use ACME payload attestation to enroll a client certificate identity, which can cryptographically validate that the device is a genuine Apple device. This ensures that only trusted devices are issued certificates, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.

  • Attestation can automate the certificate renewal process for NHIs, ensuring that certificates are only renewed if the NHI meets the defined security policies. This reduces the risk of expired or compromised certificates being used for unauthorized access.

These use cases demonstrate the versatility and importance of attestation-based access control in securing non-human identities.

Benefits of Attestation-Based Access Control

Want to fortify your security? Attestation-based access control offers numerous benefits, making it a powerful tool for securing non-human identities (NHIs).

  • Reduced Unauthorized Access: By verifying NHI trustworthiness before granting access, attestation minimizes the risk of breaches.

  • Improved Compliance: Attestation helps meet regulatory requirements by ensuring NHIs adhere to security policies. As mentioned earlier, One Identity explains that attestation and identity governance ensure that users can continue performing their jobs through changes in their authorization to access information, data and resources.

  • Increased Trust: Knowing NHIs are continuously validated builds confidence in your systems.

  • Automated Access Control: Attestation automates access decisions, reducing manual intervention.

  • Real-time Monitoring: Continuous monitoring ensures NHIs remain compliant, triggering alerts for deviations.

  • Centralized Policy Management: Define and enforce policies from a central location.

Consider a manufacturing plant using IIoT devices. Attestation ensures only verified equipment accesses the network, preventing malicious intrusions.

Implementing attestation-based access control has challenges that we'll discuss in the next section.

Challenges of Implementing Attestation-Based Access Control

While the benefits of attestation-based access control are clear, it's important to acknowledge the hurdles you might face during implementation. Being prepared can make the process much smoother.

  • Complexity of Integration: Integrating attestation solutions with existing IT infrastructure and identity management systems can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and resources.
  • Policy Management Overhead: Defining and maintaining accurate, up-to-date attestation policies for a diverse range of NHIs can be a significant undertaking.
  • Performance Impact: The attestation process itself, especially if it involves extensive cryptographic operations or network communication, could potentially introduce latency or impact the performance of NHIs.
  • Cost of Implementation: Investing in hardware security modules (HSMs), specialized software, or cloud-based attestation services can represent a considerable upfront cost.
  • Skill Gap: Organizations may lack the in-house expertise required to design, implement, and manage attestation-based access control systems effectively.
Lalit Choda
Lalit Choda

Founder & CEO @ Non-Human Identity Mgmt Group

 

NHI Evangelist : with 25+ years of experience, Lalit Choda is a pioneering figure in Non-Human Identity (NHI) Risk Management and the Founder & CEO of NHI Mgmt Group. His expertise in identity security, risk mitigation, and strategic consulting has helped global financial institutions to build resilient and scalable systems.

Related Articles

Virtualization Security

User Manual for Virtualization Solutions

Learn how to secure your virtualization solutions by effectively managing Non-Human Identities (NHIs). This user manual provides best practices, authentication strategies, and access control techniques.

By Lalit Choda October 2, 2025 16 min read
Read full article
Domain Configuration

Domain Configuration File Syntax for Virtual Environments

Explore the syntax, security, and best practices for domain configuration files in virtual environments. Essential for Non-Human Identity (NHI) management.

By Lalit Choda October 2, 2025 22 min read
Read full article
MAUI workloads

Troubleshooting MAUI App Build Issues Related to Workloads

Troubleshoot .NET MAUI app build failures caused by workload problems. Learn to fix common errors with SDKs, CLI, and Visual Studio configurations.

By Lalit Choda September 30, 2025 8 min read
Read full article
Non Human Identity

Reflections on Switching Virtualization Platforms

Explore the ins and outs of switching virtualization platforms, focusing on machine identity, workload identity implications, and security strategies. Get expert insights for a seamless and secure transition.

By Lalit Choda September 28, 2025 16 min read
Read full article